Compact Freezers · head to head
Antarctic Star 3.2 cu ft vs Impecca RC-1335SL
The Antarctic Star 3.2 cu ft and the Impecca RC-1335SL are both compact freezers in the same size and price class. Below is a side-by-side of their real capacity, dimensions, energy use, and current prices so you can pick the one that fits your space and budget — no invented ratings, just the specs and live pricing.
At a glance
Lower priceAntarctic Star — Antarctic Star is $110 cheaper at last check.
More capacityImpecca — Impecca holds more — 3.3 vs 3.2 cu ft.
More product photosAntarctic Star — Antarctic Star has more real photos to inspect (7 vs 4).
Specifications, side by side
| Spec | Antarctic Star | Impecca |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Compact Freezers | Compact Freezers |
| Model | — | RC-1335SL |
| Capacity | 3.2 cu ft | 3.3 cu ft |
| Dimensions | — | 18.5" W × 17.6" H × 33.5" D |
| Energy use | — | — |
| Color | Black | Stainless Steel |
| Price |
▪ Prices re-checked on a schedule; tap a price for the live number at the retailer.
Frequently asked
Which should you buy, the Antarctic Star 3.2 cu ft or the Impecca RC-1335SL?
It is close — each wins on different measures, so pick by the spec that matters most to you: price, capacity, or energy use.
Is the Antarctic Star 3.2 cu ft or the Impecca RC-1335SL cheaper?
Antarctic Star is $110 cheaper at last check.
Which holds more, the Antarctic Star 3.2 cu ft or the Impecca RC-1335SL?
Impecca holds more — 3.3 vs 3.2 cu ft.
We may earn a commission when you buy through our links, at no extra cost to you. Learn more
More compact freezers comparisons
- Antarctic Star 3.2 cu ft vs ActiveTrail bS4-zZVr-fKZV2x-3TiKr7Oju →
- Antarctic Star 3.2 cu ft vs ActiveTrail 3.2 cu ft →
- Antarctic Star 3.2 cu ft vs Anukis FLS-80-slliver →
- ActiveTrail bS4-zZVr-fKZV2x-3TiKr7Oju vs Impecca RC-1335SL →
- ActiveTrail 3.2 cu ft vs Impecca RC-1335SL →
- Antarctic Star 58087RRE0-STEEL vs Impecca RC-1335SL →