Compact Freezers · head to head
Antarctic Star 3.2 cu ft vs Magic Chef MCR32CHR
The Antarctic Star 3.2 cu ft and the Magic Chef MCR32CHR are both compact freezers in the same size and price class. Below is a side-by-side of their real capacity, dimensions, energy use, and current prices so you can pick the one that fits your space and budget — no invented ratings, just the specs and live pricing.
At a glance
Specifications, side by side
| Spec | Antarctic Star | Magic Chef |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Compact Freezers | Compact Freezers |
| Model | — | MCR32CHR |
| Capacity | 3.2 cu ft | 3.2 cu ft |
| Dimensions | — | — |
| Energy use | — | — |
| Color | Black | Red |
| Price |
▪ Prices re-checked on a schedule; tap a price for the live number at the retailer.
Frequently asked
Which should you buy, the Antarctic Star 3.2 cu ft or the Magic Chef MCR32CHR?
The Antarctic Star 3.2 cu ft wins on 1 of the 1 measurable factors (lower price). Choose it unless a spec the Magic Chef MCR32CHR wins matters more to you.
Is the Antarctic Star 3.2 cu ft or the Magic Chef MCR32CHR cheaper?
Antarctic Star is $109 cheaper at last check.
Which holds more, the Antarctic Star 3.2 cu ft or the Magic Chef MCR32CHR?
Both hold about 3.2 cu ft.
We may earn a commission when you buy through our links, at no extra cost to you. Learn more
More compact freezers comparisons
- Antarctic Star 3.2 cu ft vs ActiveTrail bS4-zZVr-fKZV2x-3TiKr7Oju →
- Antarctic Star 3.2 cu ft vs ActiveTrail 3.2 cu ft →
- Antarctic Star 3.2 cu ft vs Anukis FLS-80-slliver →
- ActiveTrail bS4-zZVr-fKZV2x-3TiKr7Oju vs Magic Chef MCR32CHR →
- ActiveTrail 3.2 cu ft vs Magic Chef MCR32CHR →
- Antarctic Star 58087RRE0-STEEL vs Magic Chef MCR32CHR →