Mini Fridges · head to head
Avanti 3.2 cu ft vs Crosley Appliances RRX3210AM
The Avanti 3.2 cu ft and the Crosley Appliances RRX3210AM are both mini fridges in the same size and price class. Below is a side-by-side of their real capacity, dimensions, energy use, and current prices so you can pick the one that fits your space and budget — no invented ratings, just the specs and live pricing.
At a glance
Lower priceAvanti — Avanti is $112 cheaper at last check.
More capacityTie — Both hold about 3.2 cu ft.
More product photosCrosley Appliances — Crosley Appliances has more real photos to inspect (9 vs 6).
Specifications, side by side
| Spec | Avanti | Crosley Appliances |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Mini Fridges | Mini Fridges |
| Model | — | RRX3210AM |
| Capacity | 3.2 cu ft | 3.2 cu ft |
| Dimensions | 18.5" W × 33.5" H × 17.5" D | 19.5" W × 32.7" H × 18.5" D |
| Energy use | 259 kWh/yr | — |
| Color | Black | Green |
| Price |
▪ Prices re-checked on a schedule; tap a price for the live number at the retailer.
Frequently asked
Which should you buy, the Avanti 3.2 cu ft or the Crosley Appliances RRX3210AM?
The Avanti 3.2 cu ft wins on 1 of the 1 measurable factors (lower price). Choose it unless a spec the Crosley Appliances RRX3210AM wins matters more to you.
Is the Avanti 3.2 cu ft or the Crosley Appliances RRX3210AM cheaper?
Avanti is $112 cheaper at last check.
Which holds more, the Avanti 3.2 cu ft or the Crosley Appliances RRX3210AM?
Both hold about 3.2 cu ft.
We may earn a commission when you buy through our links, at no extra cost to you. Learn more
More mini fridges comparisons
- Antarctic Star 613464773375 vs Avanti 3.2 cu ft →
- Antarctic Star 613464773351 vs Avanti 3.2 cu ft →
- Anukis 80 refrigerator vs Avanti 3.2 cu ft →
- Antarctic Star 613464773375 vs Crosley Appliances RRX3210AM →
- Antarctic Star 613464773351 vs Crosley Appliances RRX3210AM →
- Anukis 80 refrigerator vs Crosley Appliances RRX3210AM →