Mini Fridges · head to head
Bangson 3.2 cu ft vs Frigidaire EFMIS395ONYX
The Bangson 3.2 cu ft and the Frigidaire EFMIS395ONYX are both mini fridges in the same size and price class. Below is a side-by-side of their real capacity, dimensions, energy use, and current prices so you can pick the one that fits your space and budget — no invented ratings, just the specs and live pricing.
At a glance
Lower priceBangson — Bangson is $130 cheaper at last check.
More capacityTie — Both hold about 3.2 cu ft.
More product photosBangson — Bangson has more real photos to inspect (10 vs 8).
Specifications, side by side
| Spec | Bangson | Frigidaire |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Mini Fridges | Mini Fridges |
| Model | — | EFMIS395ONYX |
| Capacity | 3.2 cu ft | 3.2 cu ft |
| Dimensions | 17.4" W × 33.7" H × 18.7" D | 19.5" W × 32.5" H × 17.7" D |
| Energy use | 55 kWh/yr | — |
| Color | Silver | — |
| Price |
▪ Prices re-checked on a schedule; tap a price for the live number at the retailer.
Frequently asked
Which should you buy, the Bangson 3.2 cu ft or the Frigidaire EFMIS395ONYX?
The Bangson 3.2 cu ft wins on 1 of the 1 measurable factors (lower price). Choose it unless a spec the Frigidaire EFMIS395ONYX wins matters more to you.
Is the Bangson 3.2 cu ft or the Frigidaire EFMIS395ONYX cheaper?
Bangson is $130 cheaper at last check.
Which holds more, the Bangson 3.2 cu ft or the Frigidaire EFMIS395ONYX?
Both hold about 3.2 cu ft.
We may earn a commission when you buy through our links, at no extra cost to you. Learn more
More mini fridges comparisons
- Bangson 3.2 cu ft vs Antarctic Star 613464773375 →
- Bangson 3.2 cu ft vs Antarctic Star 613464773351 →
- Bangson 3.2 cu ft vs Anukis 80 refrigerator →
- Antarctic Star 613464773375 vs Frigidaire EFMIS395ONYX →
- Antarctic Star 613464773351 vs Frigidaire EFMIS395ONYX →
- Anukis 80 refrigerator vs Frigidaire EFMIS395ONYX →