Mini Fridges · head to head
Bangson 3.2 cu ft vs Frigidaire EFR376-MOONBM
The Bangson 3.2 cu ft and the Frigidaire EFR376-MOONBM are both mini fridges in the same size and price class. Below is a side-by-side of their real capacity, dimensions, energy use, and current prices so you can pick the one that fits your space and budget — no invented ratings, just the specs and live pricing.
At a glance
Lower priceBangson — Bangson is $64 cheaper at last check.
More capacityTie — Both hold about 3.2 cu ft.
More product photosBangson — Bangson has more real photos to inspect (10 vs 9).
Specifications, side by side
| Spec | Bangson | Frigidaire |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Mini Fridges | Mini Fridges |
| Model | — | EFR376-MOONBM |
| Capacity | 3.2 cu ft | 3.2 cu ft |
| Dimensions | 17.4" W × 33.7" H × 18.7" D | — |
| Energy use | 55 kWh/yr | — |
| Color | Silver | — |
| Price |
▪ Prices re-checked on a schedule; tap a price for the live number at the retailer.
Frequently asked
Which should you buy, the Bangson 3.2 cu ft or the Frigidaire EFR376-MOONBM?
The Bangson 3.2 cu ft wins on 1 of the 1 measurable factors (lower price). Choose it unless a spec the Frigidaire EFR376-MOONBM wins matters more to you.
Is the Bangson 3.2 cu ft or the Frigidaire EFR376-MOONBM cheaper?
Bangson is $64 cheaper at last check.
Which holds more, the Bangson 3.2 cu ft or the Frigidaire EFR376-MOONBM?
Both hold about 3.2 cu ft.
We may earn a commission when you buy through our links, at no extra cost to you. Learn more
More mini fridges comparisons
- Bangson 3.2 cu ft vs Antarctic Star 613464773375 →
- Bangson 3.2 cu ft vs Antarctic Star 613464773351 →
- Bangson 3.2 cu ft vs Anukis 80 refrigerator →
- Antarctic Star 613464773375 vs Frigidaire EFR376-MOONBM →
- Antarctic Star 613464773351 vs Frigidaire EFR376-MOONBM →
- Anukis 80 refrigerator vs Frigidaire EFR376-MOONBM →