Mini Fridges · head to head
Black+Decker BCRK32W vs Arctic Chef ACFR335
The Black+Decker BCRK32W and the Arctic Chef ACFR335 are both mini fridges in the same size and price class. Below is a side-by-side of their real capacity, dimensions, energy use, and current prices so you can pick the one that fits your space and budget — no invented ratings, just the specs and live pricing.
At a glance
Lower priceBlack+Decker — Black+Decker is $9 cheaper at last check.
More capacityTie — Both hold about 3.2 cu ft.
More product photosBlack+Decker — Black+Decker has more real photos to inspect (7 vs 6).
Specifications, side by side
| Spec | Black+Decker | Arctic Chef |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Mini Fridges | Mini Fridges |
| Model | BCRK32W | ACFR335 |
| Capacity | 3.2 cu ft | 3.2 cu ft |
| Dimensions | 17.5" W × 32.7" H × 19.3" D | 18.5" W × 37" H × 18" D |
| Energy use | — | — |
| Color | Black | Stainless Steel |
| Price |
▪ Prices re-checked on a schedule; tap a price for the live number at the retailer.
Frequently asked
Which should you buy, the Black+Decker BCRK32W or the Arctic Chef ACFR335?
The Black+Decker BCRK32W wins on 1 of the 1 measurable factors (lower price). Choose it unless a spec the Arctic Chef ACFR335 wins matters more to you.
Is the Black+Decker BCRK32W or the Arctic Chef ACFR335 cheaper?
Black+Decker is $9 cheaper at last check.
Which holds more, the Black+Decker BCRK32W or the Arctic Chef ACFR335?
Both hold about 3.2 cu ft.
We may earn a commission when you buy through our links, at no extra cost to you. Learn more
More mini fridges comparisons
- Antarctic Star 613464773375 vs Black+Decker BCRK32W →
- Antarctic Star 613464773351 vs Black+Decker BCRK32W →
- Anukis 80 refrigerator vs Black+Decker BCRK32W →
- Antarctic Star 613464773375 vs Arctic Chef ACFR335 →
- Antarctic Star 613464773351 vs Arctic Chef ACFR335 →
- Anukis 80 refrigerator vs Arctic Chef ACFR335 →