Mini Fridges · head to head
MilleLoom 3.2 cu ft vs Arctic Chef ACFR335
The MilleLoom 3.2 cu ft and the Arctic Chef ACFR335 are both mini fridges in the same size and price class. Below is a side-by-side of their real capacity, dimensions, energy use, and current prices so you can pick the one that fits your space and budget — no invented ratings, just the specs and live pricing.
At a glance
Lower priceMilleLoom — MilleLoom is $5 cheaper at last check.
More capacityTie — Both hold about 3.2 cu ft.
More product photosMilleLoom — MilleLoom has more real photos to inspect (8 vs 6).
Specifications, side by side
| Spec | MilleLoom | Arctic Chef |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Mini Fridges | Mini Fridges |
| Model | — | ACFR335 |
| Capacity | 3.2 cu ft | 3.2 cu ft |
| Dimensions | 17.5" W × 19.3" H × 31.5" D | 18.5" W × 37" H × 18" D |
| Energy use | — | — |
| Color | Black | Stainless Steel |
| Price |
▪ Prices re-checked on a schedule; tap a price for the live number at the retailer.
Frequently asked
Which should you buy, the MilleLoom 3.2 cu ft or the Arctic Chef ACFR335?
The MilleLoom 3.2 cu ft wins on 1 of the 1 measurable factors (lower price). Choose it unless a spec the Arctic Chef ACFR335 wins matters more to you.
Is the MilleLoom 3.2 cu ft or the Arctic Chef ACFR335 cheaper?
MilleLoom is $5 cheaper at last check.
Which holds more, the MilleLoom 3.2 cu ft or the Arctic Chef ACFR335?
Both hold about 3.2 cu ft.
We may earn a commission when you buy through our links, at no extra cost to you. Learn more
More mini fridges comparisons
- Antarctic Star 613464773375 vs MilleLoom 3.2 cu ft →
- Antarctic Star 613464773351 vs MilleLoom 3.2 cu ft →
- Anukis 80 refrigerator vs MilleLoom 3.2 cu ft →
- Antarctic Star 613464773375 vs Arctic Chef ACFR335 →
- Antarctic Star 613464773351 vs Arctic Chef ACFR335 →
- Anukis 80 refrigerator vs Arctic Chef ACFR335 →