Beverage Coolers · head to head
Coolski 160HR vs Cintva MJ-5874615
The Coolski 160HR and the Cintva MJ-5874615 are both beverage coolers in the same size and price class. Below is a side-by-side of their real capacity, dimensions, energy use, and current prices so you can pick the one that fits your space and budget — no invented ratings, just the specs and live pricing.
At a glance
Lower priceCoolski — Coolski is $100 cheaper at last check.
More capacityTie — Both hold about 5.3 cu ft.
Specifications, side by side
| Spec | Coolski | Cintva |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Beverage Coolers | Beverage Coolers |
| Model | 160HR | MJ-5874615 |
| Capacity | 5.3 cu ft | 5.3 cu ft |
| Dimensions | 23.6" W × 33.5" H × 25.1" D | 22.5" W × 34" H × 24" D |
| Energy use | — | — |
| Color | Stainless Steel | Silver |
| Price |
▪ Prices re-checked on a schedule; tap a price for the live number at the retailer.
Frequently asked
Which should you buy, the Coolski 160HR or the Cintva MJ-5874615?
The Coolski 160HR wins on 1 of the 1 measurable factors (lower price). Choose it unless a spec the Cintva MJ-5874615 wins matters more to you.
Is the Coolski 160HR or the Cintva MJ-5874615 cheaper?
Coolski is $100 cheaper at last check.
Which holds more, the Coolski 160HR or the Cintva MJ-5874615?
Both hold about 5.3 cu ft.
We may earn a commission when you buy through our links, at no extra cost to you. Learn more