Compact Freezers · head to head
COSTWAY 10740US-SL-CYES vs ActiveTrail 3.2 cu ft
The COSTWAY 10740US-SL-CYES and the ActiveTrail 3.2 cu ft are both compact freezers in the same size and price class. Below is a side-by-side of their real capacity, dimensions, energy use, and current prices so you can pick the one that fits your space and budget — no invented ratings, just the specs and live pricing.
At a glance
Lower priceTie — Both are priced about the same right now.
More capacityTie — Both hold about 3.2 cu ft.
More product photosCOSTWAY — COSTWAY has more real photos to inspect (9 vs 8).
Specifications, side by side
| Spec | COSTWAY | ActiveTrail |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Compact Freezers | Compact Freezers |
| Model | 10740US-SL-CYES | — |
| Capacity | 3.2 cu ft | 3.2 cu ft |
| Dimensions | — | — |
| Energy use | — | — |
| Color | Silver | — |
| Price |
▪ Prices re-checked on a schedule; tap a price for the live number at the retailer.
Frequently asked
Is the COSTWAY 10740US-SL-CYES or the ActiveTrail 3.2 cu ft cheaper?
Both are priced about the same right now.
Which holds more, the COSTWAY 10740US-SL-CYES or the ActiveTrail 3.2 cu ft?
Both hold about 3.2 cu ft.
We may earn a commission when you buy through our links, at no extra cost to you. Learn more
More compact freezers comparisons
- ActiveTrail bS4-zZVr-fKZV2x-3TiKr7Oju vs COSTWAY 10740US-SL-CYES →
- COSTWAY 10740US-SL-CYES vs Antarctic Star 58087RRE0-STEEL →
- ActiveTrail 3.2 cu ft vs Antarctic Star 58087RRE0-STEEL →
- ActiveTrail 3.2 cu ft vs Antarctic Star 58090RRE0 →
- ActiveTrail 3.2 cu ft vs Antarctic Star 58090RRE0-S →
- COSTWAY 10740US-SL-CYES vs Antarctic Star 58090RRE0 →