Beverage Coolers · head to head
Erivess ER-BV53SS vs Coolski MX-160HR
The Erivess ER-BV53SS and the Coolski MX-160HR are both beverage coolers in the same size and price class. Below is a side-by-side of their real capacity, dimensions, energy use, and current prices so you can pick the one that fits your space and budget — no invented ratings, just the specs and live pricing.
At a glance
Lower priceErivess — Erivess is $100 cheaper at last check.
More capacityTie — Both hold about 5.3 cu ft.
More product photosCoolski — Coolski has more real photos to inspect (8 vs 7).
Specifications, side by side
| Spec | Erivess | Coolski |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Beverage Coolers | Beverage Coolers |
| Model | ER-BV53SS | MX-160HR |
| Capacity | 5.3 cu ft | 5.3 cu ft |
| Dimensions | 22.4" W × 33.7" H × 23.4" D | 23.6" W × 33.5" H × 23.5" D |
| Energy use | — | — |
| Color | Silver | Silver |
| Price |
▪ Prices re-checked on a schedule; tap a price for the live number at the retailer.
Frequently asked
Which should you buy, the Erivess ER-BV53SS or the Coolski MX-160HR?
The Erivess ER-BV53SS wins on 1 of the 1 measurable factors (lower price). Choose it unless a spec the Coolski MX-160HR wins matters more to you.
Is the Erivess ER-BV53SS or the Coolski MX-160HR cheaper?
Erivess is $100 cheaper at last check.
Which holds more, the Erivess ER-BV53SS or the Coolski MX-160HR?
Both hold about 5.3 cu ft.
We may earn a commission when you buy through our links, at no extra cost to you. Learn more