Skip to main content
MiniFridge.com ▸ Every brand, compared9,657 models tracked

Beverage Coolers · head to head

Frigidaire EFMIS462/351 vs OSOLADY 0.3 cu ft

The Frigidaire EFMIS462/351 and the OSOLADY 0.3 cu ft are both beverage coolers in the same size and price class. Below is a side-by-side of their real capacity, dimensions, energy use, and current prices so you can pick the one that fits your space and budget — no invented ratings, just the specs and live pricing.

Frigidaire EFMIS462/351 0.3 cu ft Beverage Cooler
FrigidaireFrigidaire EFMIS462/351 0.3 cu ft Beverage Cooler
$55at Amazon
View best pricePrice from retailer feeds
View price at AmazonPrime$55
OSOLADY 0.3 cu ft Beverage Cooler Blue Outdoor Refrig
OSOLADYOSOLADY 0.3 cu ft Beverage Cooler Blue Outdoor Refrig
$79at Amazon
View best pricePrice from retailer feeds
View price at Amazon$79

At a glance

Lower priceFrigidaire — Frigidaire is $24 cheaper at last check.
More capacityTie — Both hold about 0.3 cu ft.
More product photosOSOLADY — OSOLADY has more real photos to inspect (9 vs 8).

Specifications, side by side

SpecFrigidaireOSOLADY
TypeBeverage CoolersBeverage Coolers
ModelEFMIS462/351—
Capacity0.3 cu ft0.3 cu ft
Dimensions10" W × 10.5" H × 10" D—
Energy use——
Color—Blue Outdoor Refrig
Price
$55at Amazon
View best pricePrice from retailer feeds
$79at Amazon
View best pricePrice from retailer feeds

▪ Prices re-checked on a schedule; tap a price for the live number at the retailer.

Frequently asked

Which should you buy, the Frigidaire EFMIS462/351 or the OSOLADY 0.3 cu ft?

The Frigidaire EFMIS462/351 wins on 1 of the 1 measurable factors (lower price). Choose it unless a spec the OSOLADY 0.3 cu ft wins matters more to you.

Is the Frigidaire EFMIS462/351 or the OSOLADY 0.3 cu ft cheaper?

Frigidaire is $24 cheaper at last check.

Which holds more, the Frigidaire EFMIS462/351 or the OSOLADY 0.3 cu ft?

Both hold about 0.3 cu ft.

We may earn a commission when you buy through our links, at no extra cost to you. Learn more

More beverage coolers comparisons