Upright Freezers · head to head
Samsung RZ40H11PETAA vs Pemberly Row PR-4753-3032352
The Samsung RZ40H11PETAA and the Pemberly Row PR-4753-3032352 are both upright freezers in the same size and price class. Below is a side-by-side of their real capacity, dimensions, energy use, and current prices so you can pick the one that fits your space and budget — no invented ratings, just the specs and live pricing.
At a glance
Lower priceSamsung — Samsung is $1,146 cheaper at last check.
More capacityPemberly Row — Pemberly Row holds more — 12 vs 11.4 cu ft.
More product photosSamsung — Samsung has more real photos to inspect (9 vs 5).
Specifications, side by side
| Spec | Samsung | Pemberly Row |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Upright Freezers | Upright Freezers |
| Model | RZ40H11PETAA | PR-4753-3032352 |
| Capacity | 11.4 cu ft | 12 cu ft |
| Dimensions | — | — |
| Energy use | — | — |
| Color | Stainless Steel | White |
| Price |
▪ Prices re-checked on a schedule; tap a price for the live number at the retailer.
Frequently asked
Which should you buy, the Samsung RZ40H11PETAA or the Pemberly Row PR-4753-3032352?
It is close — each wins on different measures, so pick by the spec that matters most to you: price, capacity, or energy use.
Is the Samsung RZ40H11PETAA or the Pemberly Row PR-4753-3032352 cheaper?
Samsung is $1,146 cheaper at last check.
Which holds more, the Samsung RZ40H11PETAA or the Pemberly Row PR-4753-3032352?
Pemberly Row holds more — 12 vs 11.4 cu ft.
We may earn a commission when you buy through our links, at no extra cost to you. Learn more
More upright freezers comparisons
- Black+Decker BUF1000LS vs Samsung RZ40H11PETAA →
- Commercial Cool CCUG108W vs Samsung RZ40H11PETAA →
- Icevival UF002-110 vs Samsung RZ40H11PETAA →
- Black+Decker BUF1000LS vs Pemberly Row PR-4753-3032352 →
- Commercial Cool CCUG108W vs Pemberly Row PR-4753-3032352 →
- Icevival UF002-110 vs Pemberly Row PR-4753-3032352 →