Skip to main content
MiniFridge.com ▸ Every brand, compared9,657 models tracked

Compact Freezers · head to head

SMETA 2.4 cu ft vs Accucold VT65MLVAC456

The SMETA 2.4 cu ft and the Accucold VT65MLVAC456 are both compact freezers in the same size and price class. Below is a side-by-side of their real capacity, dimensions, energy use, and current prices so you can pick the one that fits your space and budget — no invented ratings, just the specs and live pricing.

SMETA 2.4 cu ft Compact Freezer Black
SMETASMETA 2.4 cu ft Compact Freezer Black
$1,099at Amazon
View best pricePrice from retailer feeds
View price at Amazon$1,099
Accucold VT65MLVAC456 1.9 cu ft Compact Freezer
AccucoldAccucold VT65MLVAC456 1.9 cu ft Compact Freezer
$2,310at Amazon
View best pricePrice from retailer feeds
View price at Amazon$2,310

At a glance

Lower priceSMETASMETA is $1,211 cheaper at last check.
More capacitySMETASMETA holds more — 2.4 vs 1.9 cu ft.
More product photosSMETASMETA has more real photos to inspect (8 vs 7).

Specifications, side by side

SpecSMETAAccucold
TypeCompact FreezersCompact Freezers
ModelVT65MLVAC456
Capacity2.4 cu ft1.9 cu ft
Dimensions20.3" W × 28.7" H × 26.9" D
Energy use
ColorBlack
Price
$1,099at Amazon
View best pricePrice from retailer feeds
$2,310at Amazon
View best pricePrice from retailer feeds

▪ Prices re-checked on a schedule; tap a price for the live number at the retailer.

Frequently asked

Which should you buy, the SMETA 2.4 cu ft or the Accucold VT65MLVAC456?

The SMETA 2.4 cu ft wins on 2 of the 2 measurable factors (lower price, more capacity). Choose it unless a spec the Accucold VT65MLVAC456 wins matters more to you.

Is the SMETA 2.4 cu ft or the Accucold VT65MLVAC456 cheaper?

SMETA is $1,211 cheaper at last check.

Which holds more, the SMETA 2.4 cu ft or the Accucold VT65MLVAC456?

SMETA holds more — 2.4 vs 1.9 cu ft.

We may earn a commission when you buy through our links, at no extra cost to you. Learn more

More compact freezers comparisons