Skip to main content
MiniFridge.com ▸ Every brand, compared9,657 models tracked

Wine Coolers · head to head

Towallmark 29B-T vs COPO XLS-105F

The Towallmark 29B-T and the COPO XLS-105F are both wine coolers in the same size and price class. Below is a side-by-side of their real capacity, dimensions, energy use, and current prices so you can pick the one that fits your space and budget — no invented ratings, just the specs and live pricing.

Towallmark 29B-T 3.2 cu ft Wine Cooler Black
TowallmarkTowallmark 29B-T 3.2 cu ft Wine Cooler Black
$510at Amazon
View best pricePrice from retailer feeds
View price at Amazon$510
COPO XLS-105F 3.2 cu ft Wine Cooler
COPOCOPO XLS-105F 3.2 cu ft Wine Cooler
$575at Amazon
View best pricePrice from retailer feeds
View price at Amazon$575

At a glance

Lower priceTowallmark — Towallmark is $65 cheaper at last check.
More capacityTie — Both hold about 3.2 cu ft.
More product photosTowallmark — Towallmark has more real photos to inspect (8 vs 6).

Specifications, side by side

SpecTowallmarkCOPO
TypeWine CoolersWine Coolers
Model29B-TXLS-105F
Capacity3.2 cu ft3.2 cu ft
Dimensions14.8" W × 33.9" H × 22.4" D—
Energy use——
ColorBlack—
Price
$510at Amazon
View best pricePrice from retailer feeds
$575at Amazon
View best pricePrice from retailer feeds

▪ Prices re-checked on a schedule; tap a price for the live number at the retailer.

Frequently asked

Which should you buy, the Towallmark 29B-T or the COPO XLS-105F?

The Towallmark 29B-T wins on 1 of the 1 measurable factors (lower price). Choose it unless a spec the COPO XLS-105F wins matters more to you.

Is the Towallmark 29B-T or the COPO XLS-105F cheaper?

Towallmark is $65 cheaper at last check.

Which holds more, the Towallmark 29B-T or the COPO XLS-105F?

Both hold about 3.2 cu ft.

We may earn a commission when you buy through our links, at no extra cost to you. Learn more

More wine coolers comparisons