Skip to main content
MiniFridge.com ▸ Every brand, compared9,657 models tracked

Wine Coolers · head to head

Towallmark 29B-T vs COPO XLS-105F

The Towallmark 29B-T and the COPO XLS-105F are both wine coolers in the same size and price class. Below is a side-by-side of their real capacity, dimensions, energy use, and current prices so you can pick the one that fits your space and budget — no invented ratings, just the specs and live pricing.

Towallmark 29B-T 3.2 cu ft Wine Cooler Black
TowallmarkTowallmark 29B-T 3.2 cu ft Wine Cooler Black
$510at Amazon
View best pricePrice from retailer feeds
View price at Amazon$510
COPO XLS-105F 3.2 cu ft Wine Cooler
COPOCOPO XLS-105F 3.2 cu ft Wine Cooler
$575at Amazon
View best pricePrice from retailer feeds
View price at Amazon$575

At a glance

Lower priceTowallmarkTowallmark is $65 cheaper at last check.
More capacityTieBoth hold about 3.2 cu ft.
More product photosTowallmarkTowallmark has more real photos to inspect (8 vs 6).

Specifications, side by side

SpecTowallmarkCOPO
TypeWine CoolersWine Coolers
Model29B-TXLS-105F
Capacity3.2 cu ft3.2 cu ft
Dimensions14.8" W × 33.9" H × 22.4" D
Energy use
ColorBlack
Price
$510at Amazon
View best pricePrice from retailer feeds
$575at Amazon
View best pricePrice from retailer feeds

▪ Prices re-checked on a schedule; tap a price for the live number at the retailer.

Frequently asked

Which should you buy, the Towallmark 29B-T or the COPO XLS-105F?

The Towallmark 29B-T wins on 1 of the 1 measurable factors (lower price). Choose it unless a spec the COPO XLS-105F wins matters more to you.

Is the Towallmark 29B-T or the COPO XLS-105F cheaper?

Towallmark is $65 cheaper at last check.

Which holds more, the Towallmark 29B-T or the COPO XLS-105F?

Both hold about 3.2 cu ft.

We may earn a commission when you buy through our links, at no extra cost to you. Learn more

More wine coolers comparisons